After several days of tension and political rhetoric, Pakistan decided to play against India on February 15, but just before this decision, Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi reached a press conference, where he was asked sharp questions on the boycott. As soon as the program ended, an interviewer stopped him and wanted to know the inside story. From here it became almost clear that Pakistan was going to retreat.
‘Didn’t do anything for yourself’
When Naqvi was asked whether Pakistan obtained any concession for itself in the talks with the ICC, he clearly said, ‘Did not do anything for itself.’ He further added, ‘The decision will be taken in a short while.’ The interviewer then asked, ‘Good news coming?’ Naqvi replied, ‘We always give good news.’
Reference to Bangladesh
Naqvi repeatedly took the name of Bangladesh to justify his stance. He said, ‘You must have seen the statement of Bangladesh. Bangladesh has requested Pakistan to play the match. Certainly, his entire matter has been decided, that is why he has made this request. Another question came that did Pakistan fulfill any of its conditions? Naqvi’s reply was, ‘We had taken a stand for Bangladesh. It was about him. We didn’t do anything for ourselves. That is, the entire narrative was created that Pakistan stood for principles, not for its own benefit.
reality behind the scenes
However, according to diplomatic sources, the picture was not so simple. Many demands were made from Pakistan, including resumption of bilateral series with India, but ICC refused to accept these proposals. The path that ultimately emerged was that Pakistan would play, keeping the tournament on track.
ICC’s official stance
After the drama ended, ICC also issued a statement. The Pakistan Cricket Board clearly said, ‘In view of the prevailing sentiment, it has been agreed that all members will respect the terms of their participation in ICC events and will take necessary steps to ensure the success of the tournament.’ The meaning was clear – commitments had to be fulfilled.
Trying to save the image?
Political and sports analysts believe that Naqvi wanted to show on camera that Pakistan did not return empty handed. Therefore, the line “We did not ask for anything for ourselves” was emphasized, but critics are asking that if the game was to be played in the end, then why such a big announcement of boycott?
what was the result
Ultimately Pakistan reached the place where it had to be, on the field. The only difference is that this time the return took place in front of cameras, amidst questions and under a lot of pressure. When the match starts on February 15, perhaps this controversy will be left behind, but the chapter of U-turn will remain recorded in the file of cricket politics.
